With thanks to Marilyn for translating it, allow me to present the fourth and final article in the Sex and the University series:
겁많은 스무살 기자의 산부인과 검진 체험기 / A scared 20 year-old reporter’s ob-gyn exam experience (19 in Western age)
대한산부인과학회는 지난 5월 ‘퍼플리본 캠페인’을 시작했다. 올해부터 매년 5월 셋째 주에 진행될 예정인 이 캠페인은 여성암 중 사망률 2위를 차지하고 있지만 비교적 잘 알려지지 않은 자궁경부암에 대해 알리고 검진율이 낮은 20~30대 여성들의 관심을 유도하기 위한 것이다. 김상운 사무총장은 “많은 여성질환들이 젊을 때부터 정기검진을 하면 예방효과가 크다”며 대학생들도 산부인과 검진을 받을 것을 권했다. 그러나 이러한 필요성에도 불구하고 많은 여대생들이 병원을 찾기를 꺼린다. 산부인과는 임신한 여성들만 찾는 다는 인식이 미혼 여성들로 하여금 산부인과 문턱을 넘는 일을 어렵게 만들기 때문이다.
Last May, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology started the “purple ribbon” campaign. This purposes of this campaign, planned to take place during the third week of May from this year  on, are to raise awareness of cervical cancer, which, though the second deadliest of cancers that only affect women, is not well known, and to increase interest among women in their 20s and 30s, who rarely get screenings. Secretary-general Kim Sang-woon said, “If many female patients get regular screenings from a young age, there will be great preventative effects,” and recommended that university students get ob-gyn exams as well. However, despite such necessity, many female college students are reluctant to visit a clinic. This is because the belief that only pregnant women go there makes entering the ob-gyn’s office difficult for unmarried women.
이런 상황에 놓인 여대생들을 대표해 10학번 새내기 기자가 직접 산부인과를 방문해 검진을 받아보기로 했다. 미혼여성을 대상으로 한 가장 기본적인 검진은 초음파 검사와 혈액검사라고 한다. 기자는 인터넷을 통해 신촌의 산부인과를 수소문한 끝에 신촌역 근처 S산부인과로 결정했다. 방문 전 인터넷사이트의 예약 게시판에 평소 생리통이 심했던 기자의 고충을 적고 예약을 완료했다.
Representing college women put in this kind of situation, this freshman reporter, who entered university in 2010, agreed to personally visit an ob-gyn and get an exam. It is said that the most basic exam for unmarried women is an ultrasound and a blood test. After asking around about Sinchon-area obstetrician-gynecologists on the Internet, I chose ‘S’ Obstetrics-Gynecology, near Sinchon Station. Before going, I wrote on the appointment board on the clinic’s website that my problem was severe menstrual pain and booked my appointment.
예약한 날짜가 다가와 초조한 마음으로 병원을 찾았다. 산부인과와의 인연은 20년 전 태어나며 맺었던 것이 마지막이라 그곳에서 무슨 일이 생길지 도무지 감이 잡히지 않았다. 잠시 기다리자 접수대에서 이름이 호명됐고 전문의와 오늘 받을 검진의 기본적인 사항에 대한 이야기를 나눴다. 혈액검사는 난소암 유무를 가리기 위한 것이고, 초음파 검사는 자궁에 근종이나 난소에 혹이 있는지를 알아보기 위한 것인데 항문 또는 질을 통해 검사한다고 했다. 검진 받는 여성의 성관계 여부에 따라 추가적인 암 검사가 더해진다. 그렇게 접수를 마치고 이유 모를 공포에 휩싸여 호명되기를 기다렸다. 내 나이 꽃다운 스무살, 산부인과에 있다는 사실만으로도 이미 부인과 질병에 걸려버린 느낌이라 불안감은 점점 더 증폭됐다 (source, below).
The appointment date approached and I went to the clinic with an anxious heart. My last connection to the ob-gyn had been made when I was being born twenty years ago, so I had no clue what was about to happen there. After waiting a moment, my name was called by the front desk and I talked with the specialist [prob. the doctor] about the basics of the exam I would receive that day. The specialist said the blood test would detect ovarian cancer, and the ultrasound would check for uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts; the exam would be done through the anal passage or vagina. Contingent upon the sexual activity of the woman receiving the exam, additional cancer screenings are added. In that manner, I completed my registration and then, filled with fear without knowing why, I waited for my name to be called. I am a 20-year-old in the bloom of youth, but just the fact that I was at the ob-gyn gave me the feeling that I already had a gynecological disease, and my discomfort continued to increase.
먼저 초음파 검사를 받기 위해 탈의실로 가 아래를 모두 벗고 발목까지 오는 긴 치마를 입었다. 두려운 마음으로 검진실 문을 열자 특이한 모양의 의자가 보였다. 치과 의자처럼 생겼는데 다리를 벌려 고정하는 받침대가 추가된 형태였다. 좋지 않은 예감이 든다. 예감적중, 간호사가 의자에 누워 다리를 벌리라고 한다. 겁에 질려 검사가 아프냐고 묻자 간호사는 태연하게 “불편할 수 있어요”라고 대답한다.
First, in order to get the ultrasound exam, I went to a changing room, took off all of my lower-body clothing and put on a long skirt that reached to my ankles. Fearfully, I opened the exam room door and saw a specially-shaped chair. It looked like a dentist’s chair but with the addition of a rack to which spread legs could be fastened. I had a bad feeling about that. My feeling was right – the nurse told me to lay down on the chair and spread my legs. Scared, I asked if the exam would hurt; the nurse calmly answered, “It may be uncomfortable.”
이윽고 냉철한 표정의 여의사가 들어와 초음파 검사 도구를 항문에 집어넣는다. 간호사 말대로다. 아프지는 않지만 확실히 ‘불편’했다. 마치 배변을 보고 있는 듯한 느낌이 몰려왔다가 사라졌다. 윤활제를 바른 탓에 시원한 느낌이 들었다. 기분이 묘하다. 이 와중에 그나마 여의사라 다행이라는 생각을 한다.
(Sources: left, right)
Before long, the female doctor entered with a dispassionate expression and put the ultrasound exam instrument in my anal passage. It was as the nurse had said. It didn’t hurt, but it was certainly uncomfortable. A strong feeling that I was about to have a bowel movement came and disappeared. Because of the lubricant spread [on the instrument], there was a cool sensation. I felt strange. At that time, I thought it was at least fortunate that it was a woman doctor.
누워서 눈앞의 스크린을 보자 나의 자궁과 난소가 보인다. 혹이나 다른 이상은 발견되지 않았다. 스크린을 보던 의사가 “생리하실 때 아플 것처럼 생긴 자궁이네요”라고 말했다. 산부인과에 온 목적이 해결되는 감동적인 순간, 내 몸에는 전혀 이상이 없으며 단지 ‘자궁 모양’ 문제였음을 깨닫는다. 산부인과에 진작 왔으면 불안에 떨지 않아도 되었을 것을. 며칠 뒤에는 “난소암 혈액검사 결과, 정상입니다”라는 간략한 문자가 도착했다. 모든 검사 종료, 이제야 안도했다.
As I lay and looked at the screen in front of me, my cervix and ovaries were visible. No cysts or other irregularities were detected. The doctor, looking at the screen, said, “Your cervix looks like it would hurt during menstruation.” At this emotional moment in which my purpose for coming to the ob-gyn was resolved, I realized that there was nothing wrong with my body, only a problem with “cervix shape.” Also, that had I come to the ob-gyn earlier, I wouldn’t have needed to be anxious [about the pain]. A few days later, the brief text message, “Your ovarian cancer blood test results were normal” arrived. At the end of all the exams, I finally felt relieved.
스무살 기자에게 산부인과 검사는 약간의 수치와 6만원이라는 비용을 수반한다는 점에서 그리 유쾌한 경험은 아니었다. 하지만 자신의 몸을 위해 한 번은 가볼 필요가 있는 것 같다. 기자의 경우 마침 결과가 좋아 적어도 5년 동안은 다시 이 경험을 하지 않아도 되겠다 싶어 안심했다. 그러나 부인과 질병에 가족력이 있거나 성관계 경험이 있을 경우 1년에 한 번씩은 산부인과에 가는 것이 좋다고 하니, 참고하면 되겠다.
Considering the slight shame and the 60,000 Won fee, the ob-gyn exam was not a very pleasant experience for this 20 year-old reporter. However, it does seem that going once is necessary, for the sake of one’s body. I felt relieved that I wouldn’t have to have this experience again for at least five years because the results happened to be good in my case. Just know that if you have a family history of gynecological diseases or have sexual experience, though, they said that going to the ob-gyn once a year is good (end).
A little disappointed with the reporter’s plan not to lose her virginity in the next 5 year however, a genuine waste of one’s youth(!), then let me end on a rather more lecherous note via the above image, found in passing while preparing this post. Indeed, with a cover that says “Reasons Women Have To Get On Top“, the book sounds intriguing, and now I feel like doing some translating of my own next week!^^
(For more in the Sex and the University series, please see Parts 1-3 on students’ levels of sexual experience and activity, on an interview with a sex columnist, and on students’ cohabitation culture respectively)
9 thoughts on “Sex and the University, Part 4: A Scared 19 Year-Old’s Ob-Gyn Experience”
That was a very, very strange obgyn visit ~ virtually nothing like the visits I’ve had both here in Korea and stateside. I mean, in all honesty, that was bizarre.
I have never, ever heard of an anal ultrasound being part of a regular checkup. Ever.
And how could a cervix “look like it would hurt during menstruation”? Cervix shape varies with age, hormonal state, and whether or not one has given birth . . . I mean, a retroverted uterus could cause some mentral discomfort, but that’s naught to do with the shape of her cervix. She doesn’t report a breast exam or a pap smear.
Most of my exams have been in international clinics, so perhaps I’ve just been lucky.
menstrual, not mental . . . sorry.
I’ve had friends who went to clinic asking for an STD check in Korea, only to be told that Korea has such low rates of STD’s that there was really no need… that aside, I have my own OBGyn here who, while being a man, is incredibly compassionate and has never made me feel uncomfortable– that could be that I’m pregnant, so I’m visiting his office under happier pretenses, but still… it sounds like she maybe got a strange doctor. I agree with Gomushin Girl, but also, if she’s not yet sexually active, there’s virtually no reason to get a pap smear, since it is primarily only looking for the symptoms of the HPV virus.
Eh, most places will still give you a pap smear as a regular part of the exam, even if you’re a virgin. Although it usally comes of p&v sex, it’s still possible to contract HPV through other activities, and it’s actually looking for abnormal cells. Lots of places simply give one automatically, including the clinic at my women’s college.
But yeah, what this woman reports isn’t at all what I’d expect from an exam, and seems to be putting women through unnecessary procedures (ANAL ULTRASOUND!?!) and skipping other parts, like breast exams, pap smears and an actual, real, honest to god examination of the reproductive system. Maybe a medical professional could correct me, but it seems very strange to rely on an ultrasound (IN HER RECTUM, DEAR GOD!) rather than the visual and bimanual exams I’m used to? Or maybe she just didn’t report on these parts?
“It is said that the most basic exam for unmarried women is an ultrasound and a blood test.”
This is a sad statement in and of itself. What does marital status have ot do with it? I do know they’re using it as a euphemism, but of all things, surely this sort of article should be more frank and accurate with what it’s saying?! Also, it says “it is said,” but whjo is saying this I wonder? And were they being so euphemistic as well??
Thanks for all the comments and extra information everyone. Even I too thought that an anal ultrasound sounded a bit unusual(!), and if so then it’s a real pity, as probably it means the report would actually put more young women off from visiting a gynecologist than encourage them to visit one.
I was given a pelvic exam and an ultrasound at a hospital in Seoul (not an international clinic) because of some concerns. They looked at my cervix/uterus and ovaries … but it was a vaginal ultrasound.
I don’t really understand how they would be able to get the camera close enough to the female reproductive system through the anal cavity. The camera wand was about 3/4 inch wide and she had to press closely to what she needed to look at. Since the screen was in front of me, I was able to see what she was looking at (and for), and felt the pressure of the wand. When there wasn’t any pressure, there was no image.
Maybe it was in fact an anal ultrasound that she experienced, but I have my doubts, especially when so many girls/women don’t receive a proper sexual education here.
“Maybe it was in fact an anal ultrasound that she experienced, but I have my doubts, especially when so many girls/women don’t receive a proper sexual education here.”
Surely you’re not insinuating that one doesn’t know the difference between one’s vagina and rectum? Even if she hasn’t had *any* sexual education classes, and even if she is still a virgin, I doubt that one wouldn’t know the difference..
Having said this, I’ve been to an OBGYN yearly for a few years now to normal, local clinics in Seoul and I have never had the above experience, either. I mean, sure, the uncomfortable spread-eagle chair’s there, but like Gomushin Girl said, it sounds like a very strange checkup…
Yeah, I’d agree that of course every woman would know the difference, and that it sounds like a very strange check-up. Re-reading it now after a long break since it first went up, I definitely think the author missed out several parts of the examination.